Route aggregation is a method of generating a more general route, given the presence of a specific route. It is used, for example, at an autonomous system border to generate a route to a network to be advertised via EGP, given the presence of one or more subnets of that network learned via RIP. Older versions of GateD automatically performed this function, generating an aggregate route to a natural network (using the old Class A, B and C concept), given an interface to a subnet of that natural network. However that was not always the correct thing to do, and, with the advent of classless interdomain routing, it is even more often the wrong thing to do. So aggregation must be explicitly configured. No aggregation is performed unless explicitly requested in an aggregate statement.
Route aggregation is also used by regional and national networks to reduce the amount of routing information passed around. With careful allocation of network addresses to clients, regional networks can just announce one route to regional networks instead of hundreds.
Aggregate routes are not actually used for packet forwarding by the originator of the aggregate route, but only by the receiver (if it wishes). A router receiving a packet, which does not match one of the component routes which led to the generation of an aggregate route, is supposed to respond with an ICMP network unreachable message. This is to prevent packets for unknown component routes from following a default route into another network, where they would be forwarded back to the border router, and around and around again and again, until their TTL expires. Sending an unreachable message for a missing piece of an aggregate is only possible on systems with support for reject routes.
A slight variation of aggregation is the generation of a route based on the existence of certain conditions. This is sometimes known as the route of last resort. This route inherits the next hops and aspath from the contributor specified with the lowest (most favorable) preference. The most common usage for this is to generate a default based on the presence of a route from a peer on a neighboring backbone.
aggregate default | ( network [ ( mask mask ) | ( masklen number ) ] ) [ preference preference ] [ brief ] [ unicast] [multicast ] { proto [ all | direct | static | kernel | aggregate | proto ] [ ( as autonomous system ) | ( tag tag ) | ( aspath aspath_regexp ) ] restrict ; proto [ all | direct | static | kernel | aggregate | proto ] [ ( as autonomous system ) | ( tag tag ) | ( aspath aspath_regexp ) ] [ preference preference ] { route_filter [ restrict | ( preference preference ) ] ; } ; } ; generate default | ( network [ ( mask mask ) | ( masklen number ) ] ) [ preference preference ] { [ ( as autonomous system ) | ( tag tag ) | ( aspath aspath_regexp ) ] restrict ; proto [ all | direct | static | kernel | aggregate | proto ] [ ( as autonomous system ) | ( tag tag ) | ( aspath aspath_regexp ) ] [ preference preference ] { route_filter [ restrict | ( preference preference ) ] ; } ; } ;
Routes that match the route filters are called contributing routes. They are ordered according to the aggregation preference that applies to them. If there is more than one contributing route with the same aggregating preference, the route's own preferences are used to order the routes. The preference of the aggregate route will be that of contributing route with the lowest aggregate preference.
A route may only contribute to an aggregate route which is more general than itself; it must match the aggregate under its mask. Any given route may only contribute to one aggregate route, which will be the most specific configured, but an aggregate route may contribute to a more general aggregate.
All the formats allow route filters as shown below. See the section on route filters for a detailed explanation of how they work. When no route filtering is specified (i.e. when restrict is specified on the first line of a statement), all routes from the specified source will match that statement. If any filters are specified, only routes that match the specified filters will be considered as contributors. Put differently, if any filters are specified, an all restrict ; is assumed at the end of the list.
network [ exact | refines | between number and number ] network mask mask [exact | refines | between number and number ] network masklen number [ exact | refines | between number and number ] default host host
RIBs need not specified be for aggregate routes. By default, an aggregate applies to all RIBs to which any contributing route applies. For example, an aggregate applies to the unicast RIB if and only if any contributing route applies to the unicast RIB.
Example:
aggregate 10.0.0.0 masklen 8 { proto static { 10.0.0.0 masklen 8 refines; }; }; If any static route in the unicast RIB matches the route filter (which three of the four static routes in the previous example do), the aggregate will exist in the unicast RIB. Likewise, for the multicast RIB.
RIB limits may, however, be specified. By default, the limit is all ribs (i.e., all RIBs to which any contributing route applies). This can be overridden with a more specific limit, as in the example below:
aggregate 10.0.0.0 masklen 8 unicast { proto static { 10.0.0.0 masklen 8 refines; }; }; The above aggregate applies ONLY to the unicast RIB (and only if a contributing route is in the unicast RIB). Contributing routes in other RIBs are ignored.
Last updated November 30, 1997
gated@gated.merit.edu